October 07, 2003
 
PSA

Is you are a man with a tribal tattoo, or similar variant, around your arm, or if you are a woman with a tattoo 3 inches above your ass. You, my friend, are irretrievably lame and should kill yourself immediately.

Thank you and good night.

A Personal post by kim at 01:58 PM | Comments (13)
 
Comments

You're killing me... (laughter)

Posted by: Doc at October 7, 2003 02:27 PM

eh?

Posted by: Loooke at October 7, 2003 03:24 PM

Don't make fun of my sister. Her tattoo is way cool.

Besides, it's better than having Tattoo from Fantasy Island inches above your ass. He doesn't belong there.

Posted by: Eli Sarver at October 7, 2003 05:39 PM

I have a rose on my left shoulder....do I have to kill myself ??

Posted by: Joshua Aaron Day at October 8, 2003 09:26 AM

A rose on your shoulder is a pitiful cliche, but if you lop your arm off at the shoulder I guess that will be good enough for now.

Posted by: kimmie at October 8, 2003 02:36 PM

I like the girls with the tattoo on their lower backs. It is like they opt to brand themselves with the word "slut" making it easier to avoid them. They are doing society a service in my opinion.

Posted by: doug at October 8, 2003 09:47 PM

Doug: So you avoid them...?

Oh wait, I'm married, I guess do too...

Posted by: Doc at October 9, 2003 12:33 PM

Heh... My son's mom has a dragon a few inches above her ass, on the small of her back - a tribute to her son. And she's the farthest thing from a slut you'll ever meet. I'm still not convinced Drake wasn't an immaculate conception.

Posted by: trickfred at October 10, 2003 12:09 PM


i'm gonna get a tattoo above my arse.
it's going to be a symbol for "savior"

and i'm going to get one on my back left shoulderblade.

and one on my hip.

....yeap. someday.
:)

Posted by: kimberly at October 10, 2003 10:59 PM

come on now trickfred! she gave it up to you! enough said!

Posted by: doug at October 10, 2003 11:26 PM

oof, that's not nice doug. we like shawn.

Posted by: kimmie at October 10, 2003 11:30 PM

good point! Let me retract that statement since you do seem like a nice guy and its never right to crack on someone's baby's mama or whatever. Allow me to instead say that anyone who has it in them to so sheepishly follow trends like that deserves scorn. Somewhere inside they are irretrievably broken even if it doesn't bubble up to the surface often. Now if she had is circa 1995 then I will recant completely. :)

Posted by: doug at October 10, 2003 11:39 PM

Nope. 2001, and trust me, she's almost nun-ish. She got it there because during the 66 hours of labour, that's where she had the most pain.

Posted by: trickfred at October 11, 2003 06:40 AM